CONGRESS AND THE HEALTHCARE LAW

Yesterday in the US Senate, the maverick that we have long missed, returned. Yesterday in the US Senate, Senator John McCain made a passionate plea to his colleagues, Republicans and Democrats, to return to the bipartisan way of doing business in the senate so that they can make real progress and avoid the constant gridlock that has characterized legislative business in Congress. Sometimes we lose our way and it will take personal pain to rediscover ourselves. So did it happen with Sen. McCain. Watch his speech on the floor of the Senate yesterday on the need for bipartisanship if you haven’t seen it yet.

For 8 years, the Republican Party campaigned on repealing Obamacare. They demonized the man behind the healthcare law. And they demonized the law itself. And you would expect them to have come up before now with alternative to the healthcare law because if you are smart to know that something is wrong with a thing, you should be smart enough to figure out the solution to the problem.

The Republican Party now controls both chambers of Congress and the White House. In both chambers, they have the majority to pass laws without needing a single vote from members of the Democratic Party. Yet, six months down the line, they haven’t come to terms among themselves on what to replace the law with. Having failed repeatedly to conceive a law they can agree on within their conference, Mitch McConnell and his horde are now set on the path of repealing Obamacare without replacing it with anything.

How can you plan to pull off a roof to a house without having a replacement in place?

That tells you that the problem is not necessarily with the generally acknowledged imperfect Obamacare. An imperfect law that can easily be fixed by bipartisan efforts. The Republican Party simply do not want a legacy for President Obama.

I am an American and I do not place any stock in petty party politics.

Obamacare is not a perfect law just like the Social Security Act and so many other federal programs that were part of the New Deal were not perfect laws. But we had statesmen who were willing to work with the government to review the laws and make them to work better for America. Statesmen who rose above party politics. If the intention of the Republican Party has been for America to have a healthcare law that is affordable and fair to everyone participating in the healthcare market – the insurance companies, the health practitioners, and the end users – they would have spent half the energy and time they spent on their futile efforts to repeal the law on working with Democrats to review the law and make it better. That is how responsible and people-oriented governance come through.

But this furor has never been about a better healthcare law for America because all their efforts at coming up with some new law have repeatedly being shown to have the potential of blowing medical costs through the roof and making it impossible for millions of Americans to afford healthcare including millions already covered by Obamacare.

It is never about affordable healthcare for we the people.

Healthcare is not that complicated. And if a president or any member of Congress think so, then that person has no business being in politics. Politics involves trade-offs. It doesn’t take a president that much effort to gather representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, leaders of both political parties, members of the medical profession, and interest groups in a room and give them a mandate and a deadline to come up with a compromise bill that will be fair to every stakeholder. A president who is passionate and honest about having a healthcare law that will work for every American can easily achieve that. And it will not be as complicated as it seems. Because he or she will gain the support of the people. We the people can see through vain political posturing and we the people can also see through an honest and passionate drive to bring about positive change for we the people. Call me naïve, but President Johnson made it happen for the Civil Rights Law with his pragmatism. Something that President Kennedy couldn’t do with his idealism. See, am not ignorant of the fact that there are elements in our polity who benefits from the status quo and who will fight to sabotage every healthcare reform efforts. But a president who is willing to pass a law should also be ready to use the power of the presidency to achieve his or her goals especially when these goals are noble. If he need to blackmail his detractors, he should do so. If he needs to force some formidable elected opponents to resign their elected offices to pave way for the bill to have a smooth sail in Congress, he should do so too. As long as his intentions is to bring about positive progressive changes. Backward hateful people should not be tolerated to oppose our progress. Not when other industrialized nations are busy modernizing their societies. Not when China and Russia are busy advancing their global agendas at our detriment.

 

What is lacking in this administration is such a leader who is passionate about we the people. We rather have a president who have no interest in going to work for the people; who sees himself as a king, tweeting his whims and caprices rather than sitting down with leaders of both political parties to fashion out pragmatic policies. A president who delegates leadership on his signature campaign promise of replacing Obamacare with a beautiful healthcare law to a senate majority leader who does not believe that all Americans are entitled access to affordable health care. A president who sees governance as a television show where the creation of constant controversy to spike ratings is more important to him than substantive achievement.

So, we look to Congress for leadership on this issue and other varying issues of national concern since we do not have a leader to lead. And the Republican-led Congress have been failing woefully at governing.

For a political party that has long been championing the running of America like a business, the Republican-led Congress as a division in a large corporation would have long being shut down for its lack of productivity. And all the congressmen and women in that Congress would have been out of job long time ago. I mean how do you explain to your employer and more importantly your shareholders that as an employee that you cannot get anything done?  How do you explain the fact that you do not have the required skill-sets to work collaboratively with members of your own team to achieve organizational goals? And how do you explain your approach to work of “either my way or the highway” even when it is obvious that your non-inclusive, single-minded approach is counterproductive to organizational values of inclusiveness and teamwork?

For a group that resists with blood every attempt to have the minimum wage raised for the common man, how does the Republican-led Congress justify the stellar salary, first class health benefits, and other perks they enjoy when year in year out they report to work but do absolutely nothing for their employer and the stakeholders?

Just as every unproductive division in a corporation or under-performing stores in a store chain is put on notice, it is high time that we the people rise and demand that the position of a senator or congressman be made a part time job that is pro-rated and paid nothing more than the national minimum wage of $7.50. With absolutely no benefits. Overtime must be approved by, you know, some mechanism that we the people will put in place. It is high time they start clocking in and out just like every other regular Joe. And since their employment will be governed by both right-to-work and at-will laws, you know, we the people can always fire them at will without having to establish just cause for the firing. There is no reason they should not enjoy the same labor laws they make for us and access to the same healthcare they envision for we the people. For whatever is good for the geese no doubt should also be good for the gander.

28 thoughts on “CONGRESS AND THE HEALTHCARE LAW

  1. You must be a brute politician. Blackmail? Force your elected opponents to resign? Dude, that must be Donald trump on steroids. Do you know that.

    Like

    • Enrique, sometimes elected officials deliberately constitute themselves an obstruction to progress. Remember when Mitch McConnell said he will resist every progress in the bags for America to ensure that President Obama doesn’t have any legacy and consequently be a one term president? If you were President Obama and you have all these legislations lined up that you know that if they were passed will prosper America and you have a hateful politician stand on the way of progress. If you were President Obama and you have all the raw meat there is to have on Mitch McConnell and his family, would you hold it back or would you put it to good use to get him out of the way for America to prosper? Think about that.

      Like

    • Amanda, we never know what will or will not work until the people rises up to demand a change. But all I know is that business should not be allowed to continue as usual in Congress the way they are. By the way we praise Senator John McCain for insisting on bipartisanship as the new way of doing business in Washington. We applaud his courage and welcome the return of the maverick.

      Like

  2. What a mutherfuckin day that will be when those stupid asses in Washington will get a dose of the pill they serve the people on regular day. That will be a pretty hilarious day

    Like

    • I agree with you Money man. That will be a great day in America’s history when Congress again will become the people’s house where every member is concerned about working for people and not a conduit for serving their moneybag political godfathers. That will be a day.

      Like

  3. Shouldn’t you be writing for a news organization that actually have readership? Because dude, you are super smart from what you write. Bro, step out mehn. You are wasting your talent on this blog thing. Go work for the mainstream media. I have no doubt that one or two editorial board that reads couple of your piece will not blink an eye to hire you. Just my 20cents

    Like

    • Thank you Emeka for your kind words. I take them to heart. But believe me, I am starting better off than Arianna Huffington when she started the Huffington Post. See where that media house is right now. Do not discount the days of obscurity. The day of small beginnings.

      Like

  4. It goes without saying that congress need to be inspired to do a better job. Maybe your proposition regardless of the extremity of the measure is the only way to get them to sit up. Good work of imagination

    Like

  5. What is good for the geese should also be good for the gander. I can not agree more with you. Until congress is served with the same spoon they feed us with they will not be able to relate with the pains the average man gets through on a daily basis. If only we the people can unite

    Like

    • Kimberley, thank you for your contribution. One thing I want to point out is that when we join voices like this, with time our voices will get loud enough for the people in Washington to hear us. So if you haven’t found your voice yet, please do.

      Like

  6. We the people doesn’t matter anymore to congress. Only corporations matter these days. As much as I would hope that people can rise and demand better from their government it is not possible in this present society. We are too polarized to see the valid points you are making. Maybe it will take another 9/11 to bring us back together as a people. I hope not

    Like

    • No Emelda, we don’t need any more 9/11 to unify us again as a people. I suspect that most Americans have this common denominator of seeing our government work again. But we are speaking the same thing in different voices. When we start listening to each other again and when we start speaking to each other in a clear and less derogatory manner, we will find the strength to come together again. We are all Americans and want the best for our country. That is a good place to start the conversation.

      Like

    • Brad, I am as optimistic as you are. But when a political party in power rather than consolidate on the gains that America has made for the past 8 years are busy trying to undermine that progress; just for the sole purpose of denying the first African-America president a legacy, that doesn’t seem to me like people that know where they are going to.

      Like

  7. Members of the congress be put on minimum wage? That is the most preposterous proposition I’ve ever heard. But if that will get them to go to work for we the people. Why not brother. Ha ahaha

    Like

  8. Blackmail is never a legal political tool ina democracy. But I understand the point you are trying to make. Well thought through piece though. Keep it up

    Like

    • Well, I appreciate your understanding of the point am trying to make, Joe. For reference on this blackmail point you made, I refer you to the reply I gave to Enrique who raised the same point

      Like

  9. Why do you think making a law is as easy as you propose. Are you actually endorsing blackmail as a political tool? Dude you live in a democracy and a country of laws. You should know better

    Like

    • Mandy, I want to refer you to the reply I gave to Enrique on this blackmail issue. I know as much as you do that we live in a democracy. And there’s a saying that making laws is like making a sandwich. You do not want to know what goes in or how it was made as far as your sandwich come out looking pretty. I didn’t get it exactly but its something in that line. Like I said in the body of this essay, when a leader is honest about the law he’s trying to make and people see through that honesty and knows that the law is for good, they will support him. The republican effort to repeal Obamacare which has failed over and over in the senate, even without help from Democrats, is failing because even the republicans themselves knows that the desire behind the repeal effort is steeped in hate. How can you replace a healthcare law you are condemning to be expensive with something that will be more expensive and drive tens of millions of people out of the healthcare system?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s